Inclusion in the ‘prized’ S&P 500, however, might elude the Canadian company, says analyst
Get the latest from Barbara Shecter straight to your inbox
Published Nov 01, 2024 • Last updated 2 hours ago • 3 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Article content
Toronto-based investment management company Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. has moved its head office to New York in a bid to broaden its investor base to include passive institutional investors that collectively manage trillions of dollars.
The move was announced as part of a wider corporate restructuring, which is to be voted on at a special meeting of Brookfield Asset Management shareholders on Dec. 20. If approved, BAM will own 100 per cent of the asset management business, with Brookfield Corp.’s current 73 per cent interest held directly by owning approximately the same percentage of the publicly traded shares of BAM.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The companies said the plan would not affect the operations or strategic plans of either and would have no effect on the tax treatment of their dividends.
BAM invests globally through a number of funds and specializes in alternative assets such as infrastructure, real estate, energy and credit. It has approximately $1 trillion of assets under management.
Brookfield Corp. said the new arrangement, to be put in place early next year if approved, wouldsimplify the corporate structure of the asset management business, “making it easier for investors to understand and value the security.”
Another reason for the manoeuvre is “broader index inclusion,” which would increase ownership of the class A shares by passive institutional investors.
“Further, inclusion in the most widely followed indexes is expected to increase BAM’s visibility among a much broader universe of active public investors who benchmark against these indexes,” the company said in a statement.
It also said BAM’s market capitalization would reflect the total value of the asset management business following the restructuring.
Posthaste
Breaking business news, incisive views, must-reads and market signals. Weekdays by 9 a.m.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Posthaste will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“Today, that would be approximately $85 billion based on the current stock price of the BAM class A shares, compared to BAM’s current market capitalization of approximately $23 billion, which reflects only 27 per cent of the asset management business,” the company said.
A fairness opinion by KPMG LLP said the fair market value range of the common shares of the asset management company was in the range of $46.35 to $51.67 as of Oct. 31, 2024, and the fair market value of the class A shares was in the range of $46.43 to $51.63. It concluded the arrangement was fair from a financial point of view to BAM’s public shareholders.
Peter Haynes, head of index and market structure research at TD Cowen, said it isn’t surprising that executives at some Canadian issuers and their shareholders want to “chase index inclusion in the U.S. for its large pot of gold … that is earned upon inclusion in primary U.S. indexes.”
He said that changing the location of a company’s headquarters to gain such access is much easier than changing where it is incorporated, which has caused organizations such as S&P Global Inc. to consider what criteria makes sense to use for index inclusion.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
An “HQ can change with the stroke of a pen, but changing incorporation is a much more involved and, in most cases, costly process,” Haynes said in a note on Sept. 30. “We think S&P and other important index providers should always preference incorporation.”
In a note on Sept. 11, shortly after Brookfield Asset Management executives at a company investor day said that moving their headquarters to the U.S. would have “no downside and only upside,” Haynes predicted it would likely trigger inclusion in some domestic benchmarks in the U.S., but the “prized” U.S. large-cap benchmark, the S&P 500, would elude the Canadian company.
“After all,” he said, “S&P is mulling new rules that prevent issuers incorporated in Canada from leaving Canada’s S&P/TSX composite and 60 indexes simply based on a change in headquarters from Canada to the U.S.”
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.